The Finnish Nature League FNL

FINNISH OLD-GROWTH FORESTS

An overview at the beginning of the new millennium

 

Contents:
1. The amount of old-growth forests
2. Conservation situation
3. Legislation and old-growth forests
4. Forest ownership
5. The future of old-growth forest species
6. Logging
7. The debate on old-growth forests
8. Action needed

 

1. The amount of old-growth forests

Old-growth forests (i.e. virgin forests, natural forests, and semi-natural forests) have become rare in Finland. Estimations on the exact amount of these forests vary between 5.5% and 8.7% (about 1,740,000 hectares) of the total forest area in Finland.

In southern Finland, the situation is even worse. Because of the different history of land use it is more complicated to estimate the amount of old-growth forests in southern Finland than it is in the northern part of the country. However, it is obvious that in southern Finland less than 1% of the total forest area is old-growth.

Most Finnish old-growth forests are located on state-owned land near the Finnish-Russian border. These sites are pieces of the so-called 'Green Belt of Fennoscandia'.

2. Conservation situation

It has been calculated that only 3.6% of Finland's forest land is protected. This figure rises to 6.6% if scrub land is also included. However, scrub land has scarce forest cover (sometimes even treeless) and is usually of little value for forest conservation.

In southern Finland, the amount of the protected forests will be just over 1% of the total forest area once all protection programs are complete (today the figure is only 0.3%). It is important to note that most of the protected forests in southern Finland are young forests and really cannot be categorized as old-growth.

In summary, only half of all natural forests in Finland are protected.

3. Legislation and old-growth forests

The Finnish Forest Act as well as the Nature Conservation Act have recently been renewed. Among other things, the acts included lists of protected habitat types. However, old-growth forests are not included in these lists. Thus, new legislation does not help to protect old-growth forests. In addition, new forest management recommendations are of little help for conserving such valuable forests, despite the slightly softer management methods (e.g. green-tree retention and smaller logging areas).

Within the EU Habitats Directive, boreal old-growth forests ("Western taiga forests") are a priority habitat type whose natural state must be maintained or restored. The conservative status of a natural habitat listed in Annex I of the Habitats Directive is favorable when:

  • Its natural range and the area it covers within that range are stable or increasing.
  • The specific structure and functions that are necessary for its long-term maintenance exist and are likely to continue to exist in the foreseeable future.
  • The conservation status of its typical species is favorable.

None of these criteria are fulfilled in the case of Finnish old-growth forests. This was stated in the EU authority meeting held in Sweden on April 1999, where the conservation of old-growth forests was recognized as being insufficient by the Finnish Natura 2000 proposal. The EU is now waiting for a complementary proposal.

All existing natural forests in Finland should be preserved either as reserves defined by law or as protected forests defined by the Finnish Forest and Park Service.

4. Forest ownership

Most Finnish forests are privately owned (around 54.2%). However, in the most important old-growth region of eastern and northern Finland, nearly all old-growth forests are state-owned. These state-owned forests are managed by the Finnish Forest and Park Service.

Even in southern Finland a remarkable share of these valuable forests are owned by companies, church, cities, municipalities, and forest commons. Some of the unprotected old-growth forests in southern Finland are, however, situated on the lands of ordinary private individuals - which may make protection of these forests more complicated.

5. The future of old-growth forest species

Due to the fragmentation of old-growth forests and a decrease in their total area, a great number of species characteristic to old-growth forests have become threatened or already extinct. A total of 727 forest-dwelling species are classified as threatened in Finland. An estimated 15-20% of the species within a few well-known groups of old-growth specialists (e.g. beetles and bracket fungi) are already listed as being extinct or very close to extinction.

However, the most important threat to these species is the so-called 'extinction dept' - The disappearance of old-growth forests has mostly taken place during the latest few decades and in the last old-growth fragments living species which will become extinct as time passes still exist. The long-term survival of these species is not possible in small fragmented forests. It has been estimated that 1,000 forest species will become extinct in Finland within the coming decades-centuries even if all current old-growth forest areas are protected. If the logging of old-growth forests continues, the wave of extinction will be even greater. A corresponding extinction trend is also taking place in groves, swamp woods, and other wooded habitats.

6. Logging

All unprotected old-growth forests in Finland are acutely threatened by logging. The logging plans of some of these forests have already been drawn on paper, while others are being logged at this very moment. During 1997-1998 the Finnish Nature League reported dozens of old-growth loggings on state-owned land by the Forest and Park Service. Several ready-planned, marked-on-field loggings are known for the winter of 1999-2000. Wood from these loggings travels to Finnish and foreign markets mainly through StoraEnso, UPM-Kymmene, and Vapo.

7. The debate on old-growth forests

Finnish environmental NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations) have demanded a moratorium for the last remaining old-growth forests, which would include refraining from forest road construction, logging, and logging plans until inventories of these areas have been completed and the valuable areas protected. In January 1998, Finnish NGOs provided the Forest and Park Service and representatives of the forest industry with maps of the most valuable state-owned old-growth forest areas. However, the forest industry has refused a moratorium for Finnish forests, despite having joined the corresponding moratorium in Russia.

The Finnish Forest and Park Service performs so-called 'landscape ecological planning' on state-owned land and advertises that these plans will protect the natural values of the unprotected old-growth forests. However, landscape ecological planning has not stopped the logging of old-growth forests. When studying the published plans, it is to see that only some of the old-growth forests are protected (mostly as small, dispersed islands), while most remain in logging plans as managed forests.

Logging of the last old-growth forests in Finland has also drawn the attention of customers. For example, six major Dutch companies that spend roughly 600 million FIM a year on Finnish paper (5% of the total export of Finnish forest products) have twice questioned the practices of the Finnish forest industry and demanded that the logging of old-growth forests stop. "In the future we may buy less paper from Finland", said member of the board L.J. de Graauw from Wegener Arcade on January 17, 1999.

8. Action needed

To prevent the threats discussed within this paper from coming true, the following measures must be taken:

  • Old-growth forest areas designated within the moratorium maps published by the Finnish NGOs in January 1998 must be protected. In addition, the named but not mapped old-growth forest areas located in southern and central Lapland must be protected.

  • The need for forest conservation within the forests of Lapland must be examined and logging must be stopped until clear results have been obtained.

  • A systematic inventory of the forests in southern Finland must be carried out within state-owned as well as private forests and all forests with old-growth characteristics must be protected.

  • Larger restoration areas must be created around the old-growth forests of southern Finland, particularly on state-owned land. The tree cover of these areas needs to be left untouched, and in some cases actively restored.

  • Landscape ecological planning must be discontinued until serious problems with the planning procedure have been corrected.

To reach these goals, the following political decisions are necessary:

  • The profit goal of the Finnish Forest and Park Service must be considerably reduced. State-owned forests in southern Finland must be divided into
         1) areas to be restored and later protected, and
         2) areas to be used in exchange for protecting private forests.
    Commercial use of these forests has no grounds.

  • The short-term, socio-economic impacts of the additional protection of old-growth forests in eastern and northern Finland must be addressed.

  • A clear financing program must be compiled for the protection of privately owned old-growth forests, perhaps following the Swedish example. This program must make possible the protection of around 100,000 hectares of old-growth forests in the near future.

  • Both the criteria and application of the Forest Act must be changed to better protect the natural values of wooded habitat types. For example, old-growth forests with abundant dead wood must be added to the list of valuable habitat types.